I Reviewed G2’s 7 Best Operating Systems for Work and Play

Here’s a confession: I’ve spent more time experimenting with operating systems (OS) than most people spend picking out a new phone. 

I’ve worked in various settings, from fast-paced offices and remote setups to startups where I wore multiple hats, including troubleshooting my tech. That’s given me plenty of opportunities to try some of the best operating systems, both out of sheer curiosity and the necessity of my workplace. 

Whether it was reviving an ancient laptop with Linux, juggling macOS and Windows across remote setups, or figuring out which OS could handle a day of intense multitasking without breaking a sweat, I’ve tried them all. 

Each OS has its quirks and strengths. Some delivered precisely what I needed—intuitive design, seamless performance, and reliability. Others? Let’s just say they taught me what not to look for. After testing more setups than I care to admit, I’ve landed on my top 7 best operating system software. 

These aren’t just the big names that dominate the market—they’re the ones that genuinely stood out for their functionality, versatility, and the little details that make a difference. If you’re looking to upgrade your OS or just curious about which ones are worth your time, my list of best operating systems has a solution for every need.

7 best operating systems I tried: My recommendations 

When I first started exploring different operating systems, I didn’t give much thought to what they actually do. But the more I used them, the more I realized an OS is much more than a system that lets me use my computer. It’s the invisible engine that keeps my devices running smoothly, managing everything from the files I save to the apps I use.

An operating system bridges the gap between users and hardware, translating clicks, taps, and commands into something a machine understands. Whether I’m sending an email, designing graphics, or running extensive software, the OS works behind the scenes to make it all happen. A good OS feels intuitive, like an assistant that knows what you need. 

This isn’t about one-size-fits-all solutions. The best OS for you depends on what you need and value most. But if you’re looking for consistently delivering options, the ones I’ve chosen are worth considering.

How did I choose these best operating systems? My checklist

Testing different operating systems has taught me one crucial lesson: the “best” operating system isn’t just about flashy features or popularity—it’s about how well it fits my workflow. The ones on my list stood out because they excelled in areas that matter most to me: speed, reliability, and flexibility.

When choosing an operating system, I look beyond surface-level features like aesthetics or the latest gimmicks. The real test lies in how well it performs under real-world conditions and how it integrates into your workflow. 

Here’s a list of factors I checked based on what I’ve learned from years of testing and using operating systems in various work environments:

• System resource management: An operating system’s ability to allocate resources is critical, especially when running multiple applications or heavy software, such as video editors, design tools, or development environments. I paid attention to how well the OS manages RAM and CPU usage, particularly when running numerous open tabs or applications. Some OSs are more efficient with resources, while others consume more, leading to lag or slowdowns.
• File system and storage management: Certain systems have advanced features like journaling (which keeps track of changes to avoid data loss) or better support for large file transfers. I considered how the OS organizes and transfers files and the speed of its internal file system. I also checked if the OS offers robust support for external storage and can efficiently manage disk space without constant reminders about storage errors or space management.
• Multitasking and window management: Managing multiple apps simultaneously is a given, whether it’s a browser with numerous tabs, a messaging app, a project management tool, or testing environments. A functional OS lets me switch between windows, resize, and organize them without excessive friction. I evaluated features like virtual desktops, split-screen options, and task switching, vital for enhancing productivity. I also considered responsiveness when switching tasks—any stuttering or lag is a dealbreaker for me.
• Security and granular permissions: Beyond the basics, like antivirus protection and firewalls, I looked for operating systems that offered granular control over permissions and security. Features such as mandatory access control (MAC), sandboxing, and file-level encryption ensured that my sensitive data stays protected. I also assessed whether the OS lets me control which apps can access my files, camera, or microphone and whether security patches are delivered without disrupting my workflow. 
• Package management and software installation: When it came to installing or updating software, I examined how easy the process was. OS package managers, like APT for Linux or Homebrew for macOS, made a big difference in facilitating installation. I also evaluated how the OS addressed dependencies and versioning—whether I needed to resolve conflicts manually or if the OS managed them automatically.
• Power management and battery optimization: A great OS optimizes battery life by dynamically adjusting performance depending on workload. I checked if the system included power-saving modes for idle periods and automatically adjusted CPU usage when running on the battery. It’s essential that the OS conserves the battery without sacrificing performance, especially during more demanding tasks.
• Network and connectivity: Solid network support is essential for efficient workflow, whether I’m in the office or working remotely. I reviewed how the OS handled network connections, especially when switching between Wi-Fi, Ethernet, or VPNs. I also looked at how well it integrated with cloud services and managed multiple network connections while prioritizing bandwidth for critical tasks.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned, the best operating systems adapt to you, not the other way around. They don’t just get the basics right—they also have the little extras that make life easier, like built-in multitasking tools or thoughtful updates that don’t disrupt your work.

The list below contains genuine user reviews from G2’s operating system software category. To be included in this category, a solution must:

• Manage a device’s software and external hardware
• Allow for simultaneous use of applications
• Connect with the central processing unit for memory and storage allocation

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

Windows 11 combines a sleek design with powerful functionality. I’ve worked across several devices over the years, and Windows 11 made a noticeable difference in both look and feel. The new interface is visually appealing, but it’s the performance improvements that caught my attention. The moment I started using it, I could tell the focus was on making everyday tasks more fluid and enjoyable.

One of the standout features for me is snap layouts. I work with multiple apps and documents open at once, and this feature allows me to quickly arrange everything on the screen in a way that makes sense for whatever I am working on. Adjusting windows into grid layouts was a huge time-saver, and snap groups took it to the next level.

After arranging my apps just right, I could save the layout and return to it later, keeping me from constantly reorganizing my workspace whenever I switched tasks. 

Source

Another feature I enjoyed was virtual desktops. I’ve always preferred using multiple desktops to stay organized, and Windows 11 made it seamless to create different desktops for specific tasks. I set up one for work, one for personal browsing, and another for research or entertainment. 

Switching between them was quick and easy, and it felt like I had an entirely different environment for each type of task. This made it so much easier to keep everything separate and stay focused.

Source

On the performance front, Windows 11 was impressively smooth. From the moment I booted it up, the system felt faster, and applications opened with minimal delay. Even when running demanding programs like design software or virtual machines, the system remained responsive. It was also noticeably more efficient when managing background processes, which helped my system stay quick even with a lot going on.

However, one of the major drawbacks I encountered was the system requirements. To run Windows 11, you need compatible hardware, including TPM 2.0 and a supported processor. This meant that some of my older devices couldn’t make the jump, which was disappointing. While I understand the need for newer hardware to support better performance, it was frustrating not being able to use Windows 11 on devices that are still running fine with Windows 10.

Another aspect that I didn’t love was taskbar customization. The new taskbar looks excellent but feels slightly more rigid than Windows 10. I couldn’t rearrange icons or create custom groups as quickly, which made it harder to personalize my workspace. I also missed the ability to drag files directly into taskbar apps.

These small changes may not seem like much, but for someone who likes to fine-tune their environment, they made the taskbar feel a bit limiting.

What I dislike about Windows 11:

• The strict hardware requirements meant I couldn’t upgrade some of my older devices, which was frustrating, especially given how well they were still performing with Windows 10.
• The taskbar felt more restrictive than in previous versions. I missed the ability to move icons around or create custom groups for quick access.

What G2 users dislike about Windows 11:

“Windows 11 has more stringent structure necessities than Windows 10, requested TPM 2.0 (Confided in Stage Module) and Secure Boot. This means many older laptops aren’t compatible with the new concepts, which has frustrated some users who were hoping to upgrade their current machines.”

– Windows 11 Review, Surendra Kumar J.

As someone who relies heavily on my phone for both work and personal tasks, iOS has consistently stood out for its seamless integration and intuitive interface. After using various versions over the years, I’ve come to appreciate how Apple continues to refine the user experience without overcomplicating things. 

iOS 18, the latest iteration, didn’t disappoint—it felt polished and packed with features designed to make my day-to-day interactions smoother. Apple’s focus on usability and innovation shines through again, and the updates feel purposeful rather than flashy.

Whether it’s staying organized, connected, or entertained, iOS 18 makes those experiences smoother and more efficient.

Source

One of the standout features I appreciated was the interactive widgets. These aren’t just static blocks of information anymore—you can interact with them directly from the home or lock screen.

I used them to check off tasks in my reminders, control smart home devices, and even respond to messages without opening the apps. It might seem like a minor upgrade, but for me, it cut down on the constant app-hopping that eats into productivity.

Another big win for iOS 18 is its improved Spotlight search. I was genuinely impressed by how intuitive and powerful it’s become. It now pulls real-time results, from apps to documents to web suggestions, and learns from your usage patterns.

Searching for an old email attachment or a half-remembered app I downloaded months ago was quicker than ever. It even integrated actions directly into results—like starting a timer or sending a message—saving me extra steps.

Source

The Journal app was another feature I enjoyed more than I expected. It uses on-device machine learning to suggest moments to reflect on, like a recent photo you took, a place you visited, or even a song you played repeatedly. I used it to capture quick thoughts during busy days and reflect on highlights at the end of the week. It felt personal yet unobtrusive.

I also appreciated the expanded sharing options in iOS. AirDrop is as reliable as ever, but the NameDrop feature took sharing contact information to a new level. Instead of awkwardly typing out details or scanning QR codes, I could just bring my phone close to someone else’s, and the information transferred instantly. It’s small conveniences like this that make iOS feel thoughtfully designed.

That said, iOS isn’t without its quirks. For one, I noticed that some of the older apps I rely on didn’t integrate well with the new interactive widgets or spotlight functionality. I expect developers will address this over time, but it’s still slightly inconvenient. Another issue for me was the storage requirements. The system update took up a significant amount of space, which was a hurdle on my older iPhone with a smaller capacity.

Finally, while the focus mode enhancements were impressive—especially with the new ability to link specific focus modes to app usage patterns—they still required extensive manual setup to get the most out of them. This might feel a bit overwhelming for someone who doesn’t want to dive into customization.

Another downside is the walled garden ecosystem. While Apple’s ecosystem works well if you’re fully invested in it, it can feel limiting if you rely on non-Apple devices. For example, transferring files outside the Apple environment can still be a hassle, and relying on proprietary tools like iCloud sometimes felt overly restrictive.

What I dislike about iOS:

• Some third-party apps don’t fully support the latest features, like widgets or Spotlight, which felt limiting for power users like me.
• I feel Apple’s ecosystem works excellent internally, but it’s not as convenient when working with non-Apple devices or services.

What G2 users dislike about iOS:

“iOS offers fewer customization options than other operating systems like Android, which may be a downside for users who prefer more control over their device’s appearance and settings.”

– iOS Review, Prakhar G.

I’ve always been curious about Chrome OS, especially as someone who values lightweight, cloud-based solutions for productivity. After spending significant time with it, I can say that Chrome OS is a fantastic operating system for users who live and breathe within the browser.

While it’s not designed to replace traditional operating systems like Windows or macOS for everyone, it excels in specific use cases, particularly for students, remote workers, and those who prioritize simplicity over complexity.

One incredibly convenient feature was the seamless integration with Google Workspace and the cloud. Logging into a Chromebook instantly syncs my Google Drive, Gmail, and Google Calendar. This made it perfect for working across multiple devices—I could start a task on my desktop, pick it up on my Chromebook, and finish it on my phone without missing a beat. It’s like my entire digital workspace was always just a login away.

Source

Another area that impressed me was the Android app support. I could download and use various Android apps through the Google Play Store, extending Chrome OS’s functionality beyond just a browser. For instance, I installed productivity tools like Microsoft Word, Slack, and Zoom, which worked surprisingly well. While not all apps are perfectly optimized for Chrome OS, the ones I relied on most felt smooth and intuitive.

I also appreciated the system’s speed and simplicity. Chrome OS boots up in seconds, updates automatically in the background, and rarely slows down, even after prolonged use. It’s ideal for getting to work without dealing with driver updates or system bloat.

That said, Chrome OS isn’t perfect. One limitation I noticed is its dependency on an internet connection. While apps like Google Docs have offline capabilities, the OS is undeniably at its best when connected to Wi-Fi. This could become a hurdle if you work in environments with spotty internet.

Additionally, local file management felt clunky compared to traditional operating systems. It can feel restrictive for someone who occasionally works with large files or prefers organizing them locally.

Lastly, while Chrome OS now supports Linux and Parallels Desktop for running Windows apps, these features are more suited for advanced users. Setting up Linux wasn’t as user-friendly as I’d hoped, and the performance of Windows apps via Parallels was hit or miss.

What I dislike about Chrome OS:

• Chrome OS is internet-dependent, which means some key features lose effectiveness without a stable connection, limiting their utility in offline settings.
• The local file management system feels basic and lacks the robustness of traditional operating systems like Windows or macOS.

What G2 users dislike about Chrome OS:

“It is not for professional usage. If you are a university student who has to install many high-performing tools such as Android Studio, VS code, and Unity, you can not work with Chrome OS. The same goes for working professionals.”

– Chrome OS Review, Jahanvi R.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a name that’s consistently popped up in conversations about enterprise-grade operating systems, especially when I’ve spoken to IT teams and tech-savvy colleagues.

While I don’t work in a hands-on technical capacity, I’ve seen RHEL’s impact on business operations firsthand as a marketer who collaborates closely with product and IT teams.

When I tested it myself, I focused on how it simplifies complex workflows and supports enterprise environments. One of the first things I noticed was how dependable and stable RHEL is for managing business-critical systems. During my research, I observed its reputation as a trusted backbone in finance and healthcare—and it’s clear why. Even with multiple users accessing resources simultaneously, RHEL manages workloads seamlessly without hiccups.

Source

I also explored Red Hat Insights, a built-in analytics tool that proactively identifies system vulnerabilities and suggests improvements. While I didn’t deploy this myself, I discussed it with team members who used it to flag security risks and address them quickly. For any organization prioritizing compliance and security, this feature is a game-changer.

What intrigued me most was RHEL’s support for simplifying repetitive tasks using automation tools like Ansible. While I didn’t dive into setting this up myself, I learned how it automates updates or system configurations in larger setups. The feedback from IT colleagues who use it regularly confirmed how much time this saves.

However, RHEL isn’t for everyone. The learning curve can feel steep for someone coming from user-friendly operating systems like Windows or macOS. The command line interface approach might be intimidating if you’re not used to working in Linux environments. It’s undeniably tailored for a technical audience, and the learning curve can be steep if you’re unfamiliar with Linux-based systems. 

And while the enterprise-level support is fantastic, the licensing cost can be prohibitive for smaller teams or individual users.

What I dislike about RHEL:

• I didn’t find RHEL to be beginner-friendly. The technical expertise required makes it less accessible for non-technical users like myself.
• Another con I found was RHEL’s high licensing costs. This may not affect every user but can be a potential barrier for smaller teams or startups.

What G2 users dislike about RHEL:

“I dislike the steep learning curve, the lack of commercial support, and the finicky nature of the older, less mature versions. Centralized management is not really fleshed out, even though things like WebVirtMgr can be configured. Maintenance can be tricky. Migration from one host to another isn’t very straightforward either.”

– RHEL Review, Evan L.

macOS Sierra was my first deep dive into Apple’s desktop operating system, and it completely reshaped how I viewed workflow integration.

Sierra’s features immediately stood out as someone who spends countless hours juggling marketing campaigns, content management, and collaboration tools. It’s not just an OS—it felt like a smart, intuitive assistant built to streamline work and everyday tasks.

One feature that became indispensable to me was Siri’s integration into macOS. This wasn’t just about voice commands and how Siri fit naturally into my workflow. Whether I needed to search for files quickly, add calendar events, or even ask for directions while multitasking, Siri felt like an extension of my efforts rather than an added layer to manage. 

I vividly recall when it helped me retrieve a report from a chaotic file system with just a quick question—saving me precious minutes before a meeting.

Source

Another standout was optimized storage, which felt tailor-made for content-heavy professionals. When I first encountered the dreaded “disk almost full” notification, I dreaded spending hours sorting through files. Instead, Sierra handled it seamlessly by moving older, less-used files to iCloud while leaving commonly accessed ones locally. It wasn’t flawless—at times, I wished I had more control over what went to the cloud—but for the most part, it relieved the storage anxiety I’d been living with.

I also loved auto-unlock with the Apple Watch. While it’s a minor feature, it impacted my day-to-day productivity. With one less password to enter, I could jump straight into work, which, when repeated dozens of times a day, added up to saved time and fewer frustrations.

Despite its strengths, Sierra isn’t perfect. Universal clipboard promises seamless copy-pasting across devices but feels like a letdown, sometimes. Switching between my iPhone and MacBook worked wonderfully about 70% of the time, but the syncing delays disrupted my flow when it didn’t. 

Similarly, while iCloud integration made everything more accessible, it nudged me into upgrading my storage plan sooner than expected. It’s a seamless ecosystem but not a cheap one.

What I dislike about macOS Sierra:

• Universal clipboard glitches result in inconsistent syncing across devices and interrupt my workflow more often than I’d like.
• iCloud storage is costly and heavily reliant on the cloud, quickly becoming an additional expense.

What G2 users dislike about macOS Sierra:

“As a client, macOS Sierra offers an extraordinary arrangement that may be valuable with its predictable mix, solace, further development of components, and by and large quality. While it’s an astonishing working structure, there are reliable locales for improvement. Regardless, focusing on the positive points, Sierra’s resources overshadow any minor disservices.”

– macOS Sierra Review, Jaykumar K. 

As a marketer who spends a lot of time testing apps, creating content, and staying connected, I know that Android has always stood out for its versatility.

Unlike other operating systems tied to specific hardware, Android’s open nature and adaptability allow it to work across various devices, from budget-friendly smartphones to high-end flagships. I’ve explored Android on devices like Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy; each experience brought something unique.

There are no surprises here, but the best feature I appreciate about Android is its customizability. Android lets me tailor my device to fit my workflow, from widgets and launchers to system-level tweaks.

For instance, I used Nova Launcher to create a home screen that prioritizes my most-used apps and shortcuts for marketing tools. The level of control feels empowering, especially when juggling multiple tools daily.

Source

Another strength of Android is its seamless integration with Google services. Since my professional life revolves around tools like Google Drive, Calendar, and Docs, deeply integrating these apps into the OS has been a huge productivity boost. Android makes the process nearly frictionless when I need to quickly share a draft or check campaign metrics on the go.

One area where Android shines for me is split-screen multitasking. Whether I’m drafting ideas in Google Keep while referencing a document or running two apps side by side during a meeting, this feature feels incredibly practical. I’ve relied on the flexibility to do more in less time, especially when I’m away from my desk.

That said, Android isn’t without its quirks. With such a diverse range of devices, software updates can be inconsistent, depending on the manufacturer. On my Samsung device, I sometimes had to wait months for updates that Pixel users received immediately. 

Additionally, bloatware—pre-installed apps that I didn’t ask for and couldn’t remove—was a mild annoyance, especially on non-Google devices.

What I dislike about Android:

• Inconsistent software updates are one of the few things that frustrate me about Android. On my older Samsung device, I often waited months for updates my friends using Pixel phones immediately received. 
• I’ve encountered pre-installed apps that I didn’t ask for and can’t uninstall on specific devices, which is annoying. They clutter the interface and take up space that could be better used for the apps I need.

What G2 users dislike about Android:

“While I enjoy various aspects of Android, I also face some issues that can be annoying. Due to manufacturers applying their own custom skins and software, the platform is often fragmented, causing inconsistent user experiences across devices.

Even though this delays updates and causes differences in performance, there are other things that one might face, such as battery drains from time to time. This may lead to compatibility problems with certain applications that don’t justify the sufferings of total battery failure. However, notwithstanding these challenges, Android remains a viable option for most people because it has more advantages than disadvantages.”

– Android Review, Asit D.

When I first started exploring Ubuntu, it was more out of curiosity than necessity. I’d heard a lot about its reputation as a free, open-source operating system, and I wanted to see if it could hold its own for marketing workflows and content management. 

After spending a few weeks with it, I can confidently say that Ubuntu is a standout option, especially if you appreciate flexibility and aren’t afraid to tinker a bit.

The first thing that struck me was how smooth Ubuntu feels, even on older hardware. I installed it on an older laptop, gathering dust in my closet, and the transformation was incredible.

Tasks like running a browser with multiple tabs, writing reports in LibreOffice, and even working with lightweight design tools were lag-free. It felt like a fresh start for a machine I had almost written off.

One feature I appreciated was the GNOME desktop environment, which powers Ubuntu’s user interface. Coming from macOS and Windows, I expected some awkward transitions, but it was surprisingly intuitive. 

I liked the simplicity of the navigation—everything from accessing files to managing windows with multiple virtual desktops was straightforward. Plus, you can customize the layout extensively, tailoring it to fit how you work. For example, I added a dock with shortcuts to my most-used apps, making multitasking seamless.

Another highlight for me was Ubuntu’s Software Center. Think of it as an app store where you can install everything from productivity tools like LibreOffice to more niche software like GIMP or Inkscape for light graphic design work. The repository has a vast selection, and you can install almost anything with a few terminal commands. This was particularly useful when I needed to test new apps or explore tools that weren’t easily accessible on other platforms.

However, setting up Ubuntu and ensuring everything works as expected requires patience. For example, driver compatibility was an issue for me. I ran into trouble getting my printer to work and spent time searching community forums for solutions. It’s doable but not as plug-and-play as macOS or Windows.

Security is another strong point of Ubuntu, but it comes with a cost. While I felt confident knowing it’s less prone to malware or viruses, the lack of official customer support means you mostly rely on forums and community guides to solve problems. This can be frustrating when you’re on a tight deadline or need quick fixes.

What I dislike about Ubuntu:

• For me, getting everything to work—especially peripherals like printers or external devices—wasn’t always straightforward and required some trial and error.
• While there’s a wealth of guides and forums, I found the lack of official support a hurdle when troubleshooting urgent problems.

What G2 users dislike about Ubuntu:

“Sometimes it’s a bit frustrating when specific hardware drivers aren’t readily supported, making the ease of integration difficult, and you have to dig around for solutions. Also, some professional software doesn’t always have the same level of support as other operating systems, which can be limiting at times.”

– Ubuntu Review, Dr. Will Hernando R.

Frequently asked questions about operating system software

Have more questions? Find more answers below.

What is the best operating system for gaming?

Windows 11 is the best for gaming, thanks to features like DirectX 12 Ultimate, Auto HDR, and Game Mode. It supports the widest range of games and hardware, outperforming Linux-based systems despite their improvements with tools like Steam Proton.

What is the best operating system for programming?

Linux-based systems like Ubuntu are top choices for programming due to their open-source nature and development tools. macOS is ideal for iOS developers, while Windows suits those who need WSL or versatile environments.

What is the best operating system for mobile?

Android is the most customizable, offering a variety of devices, while iOS provides unmatched performance, security, and integration with Apple products.

What is the best operating system for PC?

For PCs, Windows 11 is the most versatile. macOS works best for creatives, Ubuntu for developers, and Chrome OS for lightweight tasks. Your choice depends on your workflow and performance needs.

Which type of operating system is the best?

Desktop OS like Windows or macOS suits most users, Linux is best for developers, and Chrome OS excels at basic cloud tasks. Android and iOS dominate mobile platforms.

Is Windows or Linux better?

Windows is better for gaming and general users, while Linux excels in programming, security, and customization. The choice depends on your technical expertise and goals.

Which operating system is the most successful?

Windows leads in the PC market, Android dominates mobile globally, and iOS holds a premium market share in mobile. Each is a leader in its category.

Operating a systematic decision

Choosing the right operating system isn’t just about software—it’s about how you work, play, and create. 

I’ve tested these OS options across personal and professional scenarios, and each has its strengths. Whether it’s Windows 11 for seamless gaming, macOS for creative workflows, or Linux for its developer-friendly environment, there’s something here for everyone.

If you’re a power user, the details matter—compatibility, security, and performance should guide your choice. For casual users, ease of use and ecosystem integration might tip the scales. Ultimately, the best OS is the one that feels intuitive and empowers you to achieve your goals.

So, which operating system will you choose to power your world? Check out the latest operating system statistics for more information.