Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the td-cloud-library domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/releande/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170 News Magazine | Get The Most Freshy News Every Day | Page 472
The daughter of the deranged French man on trial for drugging his wife and recruiting dozens of men to rape her believes she was also a victim of the sick scheme — calling her father “the worst sexual predator of the last 20 years.”
Caroline Darian, 45, took the stand in Avignon court Friday against her father 71-year-old Dominique Pélicot, who is accused of filming men raping his wife, Gisèle, 72, for years while she was drugged unconscious.
The distraught daughter identified herself as the nude, unconscious woman who appeared in two pictures on Pélicot’s computer. Thousands of others depicted various men, including neighbors, abusing Gisèle.
Caroline Darian testified that she believes she was drugged and raped at the hands of her father. APDominique Pelicot is accused of filming men raping his wife.
“I realized right away I was drugged in that photo,” said Darian, who wrote a book about the ordeal, “And I Stopped Calling You Daddy.”
A judge previously told the court that the images were kept in a file titled, “Around my daughter, naked. Darian testified Friday that they were captioned “the slut’s daughter.”
Darian described the crude remark as “beyond its inaudible vulgarity,” and said, “the caption makes me want to vomit,” Le Monde reported.
The mention of the images in court earlier this week sent a visibility trembling Darain storming out of the courtroom.
In one of the pictures, Darian appears “in someone else’s underwear.”
The woman suspects she was drugged and brutally raped by strangers in the same fashion as her mother, an accusation Pélicot has denied.
Officials believe Gisèle was unknowingly raped at least 92 times by at least 72 different men. AFP via Getty Images
“How does a person like me heal, hope to have a normal woman’s life, a normal sex life?” Darian asked the court. “How does one rebuild oneself from the ashes knowing their father is undoubtedly the worst sexual predator of the last 20 years?”
Pélicot has not been charged with abusing Darian, but has been accused of invading her and her two step-sisters’ privacy for “taking, recording or transmitting” a sexual image of her without their consent.
Darian appeared in court multiple times this week alongside her mother, who police believe was unknowingly raped at least 92 times by at least 72 different men.
Dominique Pélicot allegedly recruited the men on online forums.
Of those, they believe they have identified 51 of them, all of whom are also being tried and face up to 20 years in prison if convicted. They include a fireman, a prison guard, a nurse and a journalist.
Officials say Pélicot recruited the rapists through a website and instructed them to undress outside the bedroom and leave at the slightest sign Gisèle was awake. On these forums, he allegedly admitted to giving his wife powerful tranquilizers to knock her out before the abuse took place.
The case came to light in 2020 when the sicko was filming up women’s skirts in a shopping center.
Pélicot faces 50 years in prison if he is found convicted on rape charges.
Pélicot has also been charged in a separate case with raping and murdering a 23-year-old estate agent in Paris in 1991, which he denies, as well as an attempted rape in 1999, which he has admitted after a DNA match.
This section was produced by the editorial department. The client was not given the opportunity to put restrictions on the content or review it prior to publication.
The rules won’t apply to new personal trusts or if the fair market value of the property in the trust is $50,000 or less
Published Sep 06, 2024 • Last updated 2 days ago • 5 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Signs advertise services at a tax preparer’s office on April 15, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois.Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images
Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.
Article content
You can be forgiven if you missed the latest development in the ongoing saga of the new trust reporting rules, especially If you’ve been away over the summer.
Fortunately, the news is good since it seems to provide permanent relief for many Canadians who may have otherwise been required to file a T3 trust income tax and information returns for what are commonly referred to as “bare trust” arrangements.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
A bare trust exists when a trustee’s only role is to follow the instructions of the beneficiary. Bare trusts can potentially be used for nefarious tax purposes, but they’re most often used for real estate ownership, to protect confidentiality and for probate planning.
Various arrangements, such as when a child is added to a parent’s joint bank or investment account “for estate planning purposes only,” or a parent goes on the title of residential real estate so their child can qualify for a mortgage, could potentially be considered a bare trust arrangement and be caught by the new reporting rules.
Article content
Before delving into the new relief measures announced in the draft legislation released in August, let’s review the history of the new reporting rules, which can be traced back to 2018.
Before these new changes, a trust was only required to file a T3 return if income tax was payable by the trust for the year, or if the trust had either a capital gain or disposed of capital property in the year. But expanded trust reporting rules originally proposed in the 2018 federal budget were supposed to change that as of the 2021 tax year.
Top Stories
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The goal of the new reporting, according to the Canada Revenue Agency, was “to improve the collection of beneficial ownership information with respect to trusts and to help the … CRA assess the tax liability to trusts and its beneficiaries.”
Under the revised reporting rules, the T3 return would have to disclose detailed information to the CRA, such as the name, address, date of birth, residency and social insurance number for each trustee, beneficiary or settlor of the trust.
The effective date for the new T3 reporting rules was postponed twice, and legislation to effect the changes was finally passed in late 2022 and was to be effective for the 2023 tax year. This meant that various trusts, including so-called bare trust arrangements, would have potentially needed to file a T3 return for the first time 90 days after Dec. 31, 2023.
As the April 2, 2024, filing deadline approached, however, many Canadians panicked about their need to file this complex return and the associated costs, and sought advice from their tax advisers, who suggested that these bare trust type of arrangements would indeed need to file T3 returns.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Much lobbying ensued, and the CRA in mid-March 2024 announced it would not be assessing gross-negligence penalties for failing to file a 2023 T3 return for bare trusts other than in “egregious” cases.
The lobbying continued unabated, and on March 28, 2024, just days before the deadline, the CRA exempted all bare trusts from filing T3 returns for 2023 unless the agency specifically requested the trust to file. The CRA’s position was taken “in recognition that the new reporting requirements for bare trusts have had an unintended impact on Canadians.” Prior to this announcement, many trustees of bare trusts had filed T3s based on the rules originally announced for the 2023 taxation year.
In July 2024, François Boileau, the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson, formally opened a systemic examination into whether the CRA respected taxpayers’ rights in administering the bare trust filing requirements for the 2023 tax year.
The examination is looking into whether the CRA respected service rights outlined in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, including: “You have the right to complete, accurate, clear, and timely information,” and “You have the right to have the costs of compliance taken into account when administering tax legislation.”
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The examination was in response to various bare trustees who had already paid their representatives hundreds of dollars in order to meet 2023 filing obligations that were ultimately waived by the CRA.
The new draft legislation released last month clarified the rules. First, the new rules won’t apply to personal trusts that have been in existence for less than three months. They also don’t apply if the fair market value of the property in the trust is $50,000 or less throughout the year.
Finally, T3 returns won’t be required for trusts where all the trustees and beneficiaries are individuals and are related to each other if the fair market value of the property in the trust is $250,000 or less throughout the year, as long as the trust property consists of money, guaranteed investment certificates, mutual funds, exchange traded funds, listed shares or debt, or certain government debt.
These exempt trusts, however, will still have to file a T3 return if they have tax payable, a capital gain or have disposed of capital property in the year. They are not, however, required to provide the additional information that non-exempt trusts are required to provide on the T3 about their beneficiaries.
Advertisement 6
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The legislation also confirmed that bare trusts are not required to file a T3 for the 2024 taxation year. In 2025 and subsequent years, some bare trusts may be required to file, with several exceptions.
First, there’s no requirement to file when a principal residence is held by legal owners who are related, such as when a parent goes on a property’s title along with their child to assist the child in obtaining mortgage financing.
Recommended from Editorial
The CRA just clarified the rules on interest deductibility
CRA denies disability claim to woman with perfume allergy
In addition, no T3 return will be required when all the legal owners of the property are also beneficial owners, such as when a joint account is held by family members. And many so-called bare trust arrangements between adults and kids will likely be exempt, too, as they are below the general $250,000 threshold.
The first reporting deadline for bare trusts will be March 31, 2026.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Estate Planning with CIBC Private Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
If you liked this story, sign up for more in the FP Investor newsletter.
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
Prepare the peaches: Halve and pit the peaches, then cut the halves into 1/2-to-3/4-inch-thick wedges. Toss them in a large bowl with the lemon juice, and set aside while you make the salted caramel.
Make the caramel: In a 4-quart ovenproof deep skillet (I’m using my braiser)* stir together the sugar and water. Turn the heat to medium-high and cook, without stirring, until the surface is evenly bubbling all over and you begin to see golden and medium-brown spots in the bubbling sugar, about 5 minutes. Carefully (it’s going to sizzle dramatically) whisk in the butter and continue to cook until the sauce takes on an even medium-brown or copper color, about 2 to 4 minutes. Add the cream a splash at a time, whisking constantly, until it’s evenly mixed, and cook for another 3 to 4 minutes. Add flaky salt and stir to combine.
Remove from the heat just long enough to carefully ladle 2/3 cup of the sauce carefully into a spouted dish or bowl for later, and set that portion aside.
Parcook the peaches: Return the pan to the stove over medium heat, and add the peaches to the remaining caramel in the pan. The coolness of the peaches will cause the caramel sauce to seize up a little, but do not fret. Just let the peaches and caramel warm up and the sauce will loosen. Cook peaches and caramel together, stirring frequently, until the peaches have softened slightly, about 5 minutes. Stir in the cornstarch or tapioca flour until it disappears.
Make the crisp topping: Mix all of the topping ingredients in a large bowl until the butter is evenly dispersed and the mixture is rubbly. Sprinkle the topping over the peaches, then transfer pan to the oven and bake until the peaches are tender, their juices visibly bubbling around the crisp topping, and the topping is a light, nutty brown, about 20 minutes. Let it cool for 10 minutes, if you can bear it, before serving.
To serve: Scoop the crisp into bowls and top with ice cream and a drizzle of the reserved caramel sauce. If your caramel sauce has cooled and firmed up, you can warm it up quickly in the microwave — check every 10 seconds, as it warms and bubbles up quickly — or in a small saucepan on the stove.
Do ahead: Leftover crisp should keep in the fridge for 5-6 days, but it would be unprecedented. Leftover caramel sauce will keep for two weeks.
* If you don’t have a pan that goes from stove to oven, simply use a large, deep skillet for the caramel and parcooking the peaches, and transfer the peaches and sauce to a 4-quart or 9×13-inch baking dish pan for the baking portion, sprinkling the topping on just before it goes in the oven.
In my research into healthy alternatives to non-stick pots and pans, ceramic stood out. I’ve tried a few ceramic brands, and Xtrema cookware has become one of my absolute favorites. Not only is it beautiful, but it’s also practical and durable. Here’s why my Xtrema ceramic cookware set was well worth the investment for my […]
Continue reading Xtrema Ceramic Cookware: Is it a Good Option?…
Peek behind the scenes of The Guide to The Orville with author and science consultant André Bormanis. Discover his favorites, inspirations, and the making of the incredible world of The Orville and beyond.
PIN ME for later
André Bormanis isn’t just creating sci-fi magic, he’s also bridging the gap between science and storytelling to inspire and entertain. With a background steeped in science, he has brought his expertise to Star Trek: The Next Generation, Voyager, and Enterprise, where his magic blends scientific truths with stories that keep us on the edge of our seats.
Now, André channels his knowledge into The Orville, Seth MacFarlane’s hit series. As both a writer and science consultant, he ensures the science behind the scenes is as compelling as the on-screen drama. His latest project, The Guide to The Orville, takes fans deeper into the series, offering a look at the intricate details and the passion that brings the show to life.
RELATED: Best New Sci-Fi Books To Read
As we’re waiting for the publication of André’s new book, The Guide to The Orville, we decided to get to know him a little better and get a clear picture of how this incredible book and world came to be.
In our conversation, we skip the spoilers and dive into the heart of André’s work and his favorite moments, the characters he loves, and the joy of merging real science with fiction. He shares what fuels his creativity, recounts memorable fan interactions, and reveals the collaborative spirit that makes The Orville so special.
If you’re a fan of The Orville or just love good sci-fi, you’re in for a treat. André Bormanis opens up about his journey, his inspirations, and his favorite stories, giving us an insider’s view of the magic behind The Orville.
Once again, we’d like to thank André for being such a fascinating interviewee and for generously sharing his time and incredible knowledge with us. Enjoy!
A.C.:Could you mention some of your favorites? Favorite moment, characters, spaceships, or anything else that comes to mind when it comes to the show?
A.B.: Oh yeah, there were so many over the three seasons of the show. We did an episode that involved the Orville discovering a huge starship that was a multi-generation ship that was made to look, for all intents and purposes, as if you were on the surface of a planet when you enter the Ship. That was a lot of fun to do.
There was a planet that we featured in the very final episode of season 3 that we see only in the environmental simulator a character we’d met in an earlier show Lysella from the planet Sargus 4 has found her way back to the Orville and Kelly wants to show her some of the most amazing, you know, things that are out there for her to explore, potentially as part of the crew of a starship. And there is a planet that’s essentially like it’s an asteroid a few miles in diameter, there is centrifugal force that creates a kind of gravity so that you could walk around on the inside surface of this asteroid.
But if you got up to the poles, the gravity would start decreasing. And since this was sort of an icy, watery world, I said, you know, there’s going to be weather on this asteroid. It’s going to be internal. And we should have condensation near the poles raining down toward and then, you know, falling onto the interior surface near the equator. So, we spent several hours talking about this and the creatures who live there live on the interior. So it’s like an inside-out planet.
I had a great deal of fun designing that with our special effects supervisor, Brandon Fayette, how to make this work. I said, well, it would have to be rotating so that there is centrifugal force that creates a kind of gravity so that you could walk around on the inside surface of this asteroid. But if you got up to the poles, the gravity would start decreasing.
Another… The episode with Charlize Theron, she, as it turns out, was, spoiler alert, a con artist. She helps us navigate through a dark matter storm, which could have destroyed the ship.
Now dark matter is something that we have known about for 25 or so years at least, probably longer. There seems to be something in the universe that has a gravitational attraction which explains the way galaxies and galaxy clusters rotate their dynamics.
We have no idea what this matter might be. We can’t see it. We only know it’s there because of its gravity. And we have yet to detect it or to figure out what it might be made of. Is it a new kind of subatomic particle? Is it maybe neutrinos and they have more mass than we realize, at least some of them? Could it be microscopic black holes? Nobody knows yet.
So the problem in this episode, of course, was, well, we can’t see it and yet we’ve got to see it to be able to navigate through the dark matter storm so we talked quite a bit about how to visualize that and of course, you know, we proposed that you can’t see it with regular visual scanners. So we made up some kind of a subatomic particle as a scanning beam.
And it had that property that it just happens to illuminate whatever the dark matter is made of. And we kind of, you know, skipped over what that might be because nobody knows. And I didn’t want to produce something that five years from now people will say, well, that’s ridiculous because now we know it’s not that. It’s this other thing, right?
A.C.:The Orville had so many amazing guest stars. Do you have favorites that you were extra excited to work with?
A.B.: We have been very lucky to have some absolutely terrific guest stars. The main cast, of course, is fantastic, and we couldn’t have asked for a better group of people. Seth, you know, made all the casting decisions. The chemistry is great. They’re all really talented actors.
You know, I was particularly thrilled, I have to say, in season three, when my writing partner on The Orville, Brannon Braga, we got to write an episode where the guest star was Dolly Parton.
She’s an icon. She’s amazing. I’ve always liked her work. I’m not a particularly big fan of country music. I like classical and jazz. You see my piano over there.
But, you know, I love Dolly Parton, and some of her songs, like Jolene and others, just amazing works of art. And I was so thrilled.
She’s an amazing person, done so much good in the world, and I’ve never heard a bad thing said about her. I was so thrilled we were going to get to write a scene for her, and I was so looking forward to meeting her, but COVID put an end to all of those plans.
We started writing that episode just before the world went into the COVID lockdown in March of 2020. We were into production in March of 2020. Most of the scripts had been written. We were doing some rewrites. I think we’d shot at least one, maybe two episodes of the third season. And I remember being in a production meeting on the morning of March 13, 2020. It was a Friday. And at the end of the meeting somebody came in and set up “Everybody’s got to go home we’re shutting down.” and we knew that could happen.
We were shut down for nine months. We didn’t resume filming until 2021 and when we did it was a very strict, you know, quarantine kind of protocol. So only people who had to be on set were allowed on set.
Writers like me, we were not necessary to be on set. So we couldn’t get to go. And not only that, but Dolly Parton shot her scene back in Nashville, Tennessee, where she lives. Seth and the director went out there, and they built a little one or two wall set to match the one that we had on our soundstage. And I never got to meet her.
Imani Pullum, who plays Topa, she’s an amazing young actress, she’s terrific. Charlize was great. I love Rob Lowe as Darulio. Rob Lowe was great.
And I got to, you know, I spend a certain amount of time on set, you know, before the lockdown happened. I was there, you know, two or three days a week typically. Sometimes I would be there specifically to look at computer graphics, you know, on our computer screens, and make sure that they were depicting the things that the script called for. And, you know, I would help supervise some of that.
So, Seth liked me to check those things and he’d have me come down to do that sort of stuff. And then, of course, in the visual effects, you know, after we shoot the show and we’ve got to do all of the visuals, I would be very involved in that if it was something astronomical, you know, something scientific, right? But I was on set when we were doing the first season episode with Darulio, Rob Lowe’s character, where we hear him speak. And he seems to be getting everybody excited somehow. It turns out he releases a pheromone.
It was a great episode. It was written by Liz Heldens, who’s an amazing writer and she was fantastic and did a great job on that show. Rob was just, Rob was so fun to talk to and you know, of course he’s in this blue makeup and you wouldn’t recognize him if you didn’t know it was, if it was Rob.
Something he and I have in common… We were both big fans of a TV show called Lost in Space. Okay, it was a pretty silly TV show. The robot and danger Will Robinson and it started off as kind of a serious family drama, but then it turned into this kind of crazy campy thing. But Rob and I were both huge fans as kids and we spent a lot of time talking about Lost in Space. “Do you remember that episode where the guy was dressed up like a carrot?” “Yeah, what was up with the carrot guy?” When you’re a six-year-old kid, it’s fascinating, you know.
A.C.:You’re a writer and a science consultant. Which part of your job do you enjoy the most?
A.B.: Well, I enjoy writing. I enjoy writing scripts and dialogue and coming up with stories and writing for characters, you know, and we have so many great characters on the show. When I first came to Los Angeles in 1993, I was hired to be a science consultant on the final season of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
I came here, with the intention of trying to sell stories to the show. I had written some story ideas, I had not sold anything. I wrote what we call a spec script, a speculative submission, an episode script for Star Trek: The Next Generation. I think it was in their third or fourth season. And I sent it in, and I got a very polite, thanks but no thanks, but I was encouraged enough to want to try to do that again.
And getting hired as their science consultant gave me the opportunity to go in and pitch story ideas. And I’d taken some screenwriting classes. I’d learned, you know, the basics of how to write a script for a television show and thought I had some pretty good ideas. I eventually sold a story to Star Trek: Voyager, and then a month later sold another one.
And then they asked me to write a script because everybody on the writing staff was busy and they needed somebody to quickly take a story that they developed and turn it into a script. They asked me to do it, and I did it, and they liked it.
So that’s what I kind of came out here to do.
I still love science. I still love reading about and writing about science. I love helping the other writers and Seth with the scientific ideas and visualizations on The Orville. I Gotta say it’s very fun to be kind of at the intersection of art and science and being a worker and a consultant on The Orville allows me to do that and that makes me very happy.
A.C.:As a science consultant, did you have an especially exciting or challenging task?
A.B.: Yeah, you know, I think the time travel episodes are always challenging. We did a couple of those. Pria episode, one called Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, which was the first of two parts.
It’s always tricky because there are always these sorts of paradoxes in time travel and the idea that if time travel were possible and you were to travel back into the past… could you kill the grandparent before your parents were born? That’s a paradox because if you kill your grandparents before your father or mother is born you would never be born. So how did you exist to travel into the past? Right?
These are the kinds of things that always crop up when you do time travel stories. But you know what’s interesting today, the way we think about time travel, at least the way physicists think about it, you know, it’s becoming, I think, more and more accepted that space and time are not fundamental properties of the Universe, that space and time are emergent properties of quantum mechanics, quantum mechanics being the physics of atoms and subatomic particles and how they work and interact, which is very, very different from classical physics.
You know, if you throw a baseball and it’s spinning, you can measure exactly how it’s spinning and what direction. In quantum mechanics, if you have an electron traveling through space and it’s spinning, you cannot know how it’s spinning until you measure it. And you will find that it is either spinning up or down. Only two possibilities, up or down, in the direction in which you’re taking the measurement.
Now people at first, when they realized this is how it works, said that, oh, we’re just ignorant. You know, we just don’t know. And Albert Einstein was one of these people. He said, oh, there are hidden variables, things we don’t know about yet, that would tell you before you make the measurement which way that electron is spinning. And ultimately, we discovered Einstein was wrong. That is not the case. It is a fact that not only can you not tell ahead of time before you make the measurement, but how the electron is spinning is not determined. Its spin state doesn’t exist until you measure it. That is bizarre, right?
But here is the most bizarre thing. If you have two electrons, and they are in a state that we call entanglement, meaning that they were created at the same time, for example, they have a connection between them. And if you sent them into opposite directions, into space, hundreds, thousands of light years away from each other, you know, traveling close to the speed of light. If you measured the spin on one electron and you found it was spinning up, the other one would have to be spinning down.
How does the one tell the other which way to spin? Neither one of them has a definite spin before you make the measurement. They’re both determinate, but yet when you measure one somehow instantaneously, the other one, no matter how far away in space and time is going to be the opposite.
How does that work? Well, we think that it’s because there is some connection that transcends space and time between these entangled particles. And entangled particles are the rule in physics. All of these different subatomic particles that make up ordinary matter and all of the exotic subatomic particles, they obey these weird laws of quantum mechanics.
What does that tell us about space and time? Well, it probably tells us, among other things, they’re not fundamental. Maybe time travel is possible, if we really understand more deeply how space and time emerge from these quantum probabilities, right? It’s crazy stuff and it is very exciting to think about what that might mean.
Technology for what we can’t do with physics, what we can do. I find those kind of questions still absolutely fascinating. One of the joys of working on a show like The Orville, I get to think about and explore those questions and talk to the other writers about them, talk to Seth. And it makes for a lot of fun conversations in the writers’ room.
A.C.:The Orville fans are also passioniate. Have there been any memorable interactions with fans that have stood out to you over the years?
A.B.: Oh, absolutely. Yeah, you know, we’ve been to Comic-Con a few times. I’ve been overwhelmed by how positive the reception to the show has been. The fans are always very enthusiastic. They are very generous with their praise, and they have all sorts of questions, just to see the excitement.
And I like it when the fans challenge something, you know, and they say, “Wait a minute, but if you did this, because you’ve done that…”, you know, I love that interaction. It helps keep me sharp, you know, it helps me keep thinking about some of the undermining science.
And, you know, I do talk to other scientists about the show. In fact, when I was writing The Guide to The Orville, I wanted to make sure that our discussion of our faster-than-light quantum drive, how we can travel faster than the speed of light and go to other star systems in a matter of hours or days. I wanted to come up with an approach that was different from the way that we described it back on Star Trek.
So I talked to an old college friend of mine, Joel Sercel, who is a Ph.D. plasma physicist and engineer. He helped design the engines, the ion engines for a spacecraft called Dawn that explored the asteroids Ceres and Vesta a few years ago. And Joel told me about a theory by a well-known physicist named Roger Penrose, who has his own theory of quantum gravity. And I thought, oh, I want to look into this.
And Joel explained it to me. I don’t claim I understand it in any great detail, but it’s kind of fascinating. He took a very different approach than the idea of warping space per se, and that’s what I used as the basis for describing how our quantum drive works in The Guide to the Orville. And I’m the first to admit that there is a lot of hand-waving, as we say in my description, because I can’t explain it because nobody knows how to build something like that. We have some ideas about how something like that might work.
And we know, for example, that, you know, conservation of energy would have to play a role, that this idea that space and time and gravity are not fundamental, but are emergent properties of quantum mechanics, we think that maybe that’s where the key to creating something like, you know, the quantum drive would have to be.
So that’s how I talk about it in the book and how I’ve talked about it to Seth. And you know, we wanted to distinguish our show from some of the established technology and language of Star Trek. Clearly, there’s a fair amount of overlap because, you know, we’re 400 years in the future, it’s a starship with a crew and, you know.
It is quite different. It is different in tone and different, I think, in substance in many ways. We share the same idea of humanity has a great future ahead of it. If only we can kind of get our act together today, which is the challenge, the real challenge, right?
A.C.: Is that where you get your inspiration from, colleagues? What else inspires you when creating new episodes or writing new scenes for The Orville?
A.B.: Oh yeah, absolutely. And you know, keeping up with what’s happening in the real sciences. I follow a lot of the news, I read journals online. I try to keep in touch with friends who are working in physics and astronomy, you know, I have friends who are astrophysicists, theoretical physicists, and I talk to them on a regular basis. Most of what we do on the show are things that I’m already familiar with and that I know enough to be able to talk to the writers about.
But I also want to find out what’s new, what’s happening, where are the breakthroughs. When we detected the first gravitational waves, that was only a few years ago. And I happen to know Kip Thorne. I don’t know him well, but I’ve met him a few times and was on a panel with him, who is a physicist who won the Nobel Prize for his work developing those gravitational wave detectors, you know. And so that’s exciting and it inspires me.
It inspires me to think the big picture and what else, you know, what are these other, you know, extraordinary discoveries that are happening now that could someday lead to the kinds of technologies that would make a ship like the Orville possible.
A.C.:If you could collaborate with any historical figure in science or literature on an episode of The Orville, who would it be and what kind of episode would you create?
A.B.: Yeah, you know, that’s a great question. And I thought about that, you know, when I first saw your list of things that you wanted to talk about.
One thing that came to mind is a guy named Fred Hoyle. Fred passed away some years ago, I met him sort of accidentally thirty some years ago in Montreal, Canada, at a meeting of the International Astronomical Union that I was invited to. This is when I was doing space policy work for NASA and I lived in Washington, D.C. and was a student, graduate student at George Washington University.
I’m at this I’m to this conference up in Montreal, sitting down one afternoon to have lunch in the big cafeteria and I see a table that could seat five or six people. There was just one old guy there. So, I sat down and I said, “Hey, do you mind if I sit here?”, he said, “No, no, no, no”.
And I looked at his name badge and it’s Sir Fred Hoyle. I’m like, oh my God, Fred Hoyle. I knew his name because he was a pioneer astrophysicist in the 1940s. Like probably starting in the late 30s and early 40s and 1950s. He was one of the people who figured out the fundamentals of something called stellar nucleosynthesis.
How atoms in stars, you know, stars are mostly hydrogen and helium. Stars get their energy by converting, fusing hydrogen into helium, you know, two hydrogen atoms come together to make a helium atom and it releases energy. And the helium atoms later, when you run out of hydrogen, can come together and make carbon and oxygen and things like that.
Well, Fred figured out a lot of this and how the heavy elements got made, and how stars are heavy element factories. And that’s where all the heavy elements in the universe come from. Yeah, amazing guy, right? Also a science fiction novelist. And I remember he wrote a book in the 1950s, I think, called The Black Cloud, where a black cloud is approaching our solar system and it’s going to kind of dim the sun, and we’re all very worried about how that’s going to affect the climate.
Well, it turns out this cloud is intelligent. It’s like a giant brain, and the electrical activity is happening in the charged particles in the cloud. And this thing is hundreds of millions of miles across. Fascinating. I think he was the first person who really kind of raised the idea that consciousness could exist in something other than an organic brain.
And he also came up with a lot of other really interesting ideas that were considered kind of far out and science fictional. Like, you know, why do comets historically, comets are thought of as these portents of doom, right? That they could, you know, potentially mean like, oh my God, the king is going to be murdered, you know, or this, that, or the other is going to happen. Well, they were also associated with plagues and pestilence.
Fred thought we’ve discovered organic molecules in the spectra of the tales of comets. Maybe there are actually viruses in comets or other pathogens that could fall to the Earth. You know, the Earth passes through the tales of comets, comet debris, pretty regularly. That’s when you get a meteor shower. A meteor shower is usually debris from comets that have passed through our solar system hundreds of thousands of years ago, right?
He thought maybe that was where these legends came from. Interesting idea. Very brilliant, creative man. And I just luckily sat down next to him, totally random chance, at this meeting and had a lovely conversation with Sir Fred. He was knighted by the Queen. He was The Astronomer Royal of England for many years and a wonderful, fascinating guy. I would love to collaborate with somebody like Fred Hoyle. He passed away, as I said, many years ago.
The other person I would have loved to have collaborated with is probably my favorite writer from growing up, still one of my favorite writers of all time, Ray Bradbury. First met Ray when I was 19 years old. I actually got to work on a couple of projects with him many years later for a group called the Planetary Society, which was founded by Carl Sagan and a couple of other people.
And we were doing a fundraiser based on readings of the works of Ray Bradbury. And I got to work with Ray on putting together the readings and choosing the material and getting some of the actors from Star Trek that I was working with to be presenters and to do these little short plays and readings. And it was fantastic. Lovely, wonderful man, full of enthusiasm, loves writing, loves science. He was just fantastic. He was a huge inspiration to me growing up. Very kind man and great mentor.
I still love doing it. And I was so excited when, you know, I was approached by Seth and David Goodman, one of our other writers and executive producers, about this book idea. You know, they came to me. This was actually probably just a few weeks before we had to shut down because of COVID. And Seth had told David that Dark Horse Comics, which had published some comic books that David had written, wanted to do an in-universe book about the Orville, like a coffee table book, you know.
But they wanted it to be in-universe, meaning treating the ship and its crews as if they’re real people and this is a real ship.
So Seth didn’t really have any ideas and he went to David, and David wasn’t really sure what to do with that. And David came to me and he said, you know, they want to do this book if you’ve got any ideas.
The idea that I came up with, which I pitched to David and Seth, which they loved, was what if we do it as like a new officer’s manual? Say you’ve just graduated from Union Point or this is your first ship assignment, first time you’re on a starship. What do you need to know about this specific ship and its crew so that you’re not overwhelmed when you come aboard the ship and take your place?
Kind of like, you know, I would hope that if you’re somebody in like the Navy and you’re assigned to an aircraft carrier and you’ve never been part of an aircraft carrier crew, they give you some information about what that’s like.
How big is the ship? How big is the crew? Where’s this? Where’s that? Who are the senior officers? Where do they come from? So that was my inspiration.
A.C.: It’s so amazing for us, fans as well to read the book and feel like, “Oh, I’m part of the crew”.
A.B.: Yeah, exactly. That was the whole idea. The whole idea is you are part of the crew. And then, you know, I wanted to include, you know, material from the episodes, but I didn’t want to just do episode synopses. You can find those online.
You know, if you go online, you can see the plot of every episode in a lot of detail. You can probably find some of the scripts and so forth. So, I didn’t want to just repeat that. That’s when I came up with this idea for personal logs, to have one character from each episode recount their experience in that episode and what they took away from it.
That was a lot of fun to write, too, because it gave me the chance to revisit all of those episodes and also to see them from a different perspective. What did Kelly, how did she feel after this meeting her seven year younger self and thinking about the road not taken you know all of these other things.
How did Topa feel when she finally realized that she really was not not a boy but a girl and soon to be a young woman. That was great fun. It was a creative challenge, but it made me think about, you know, what are these episodes really about?
We think about that and we talk about that sometimes in the writers’ room, but, when I write a script, when Brannon and I work together to write a script, we’re doing it somewhat intuitively. We have an outline. We outline every episode in the writers’ room. Seth is in charge of that whole process, comes up with most of the story ideas and most of the, you know, areas that we want to explore on the show. But then when we have the outline, the writer has to sit down and write the script, the dialogue, and how the characters are talking to each other. And you just kind of find that as you write, you know.
It’s great to have a partner like Brannon. I’ve known Brannon for over 30 years now, since Star Trek: The Next Generation. He and Ronald Moore wrote the great series finale for The Next Generation, All Good Things. And I got to work on that as the science consultant. That was exciting. And then we worked on Voyager and Enterprise together.
And then we worked on a show called Threshold. That only lasted about 13, 14 episodes. And then we didn’t work together for a while, probably 10 years. We’d see each other occasionally, have dinner or whatever. But then we didn’t work together again untilCosmos, which Seth MacFarlane got the ball rolling on.
Cosmos was something that I watched when I was young. I was a huge fan of Carl Sagan. I loved Carl’s writing. Another person, another scientist I would have loved to collaborate with is Carl Sagan. Sadly, he passed away much too young in the mid-1990s.
I met him a couple of times briefly. I’ve worked with Ann Druyan, she and Carl created the original Cosmos and the movie Contact. When I found out there was going to be another season of Cosmos, Seth was the one who got it sold to Fox. It had been delayed a few times, and the astronomer that Carl and Ann had worked with on the original Cosmos was no longer available to work on the new one.
So, Brannon asked me, would you like to meet with Ann and see if she would like, you know, you, and I’m like, ah, of course. And that was great. It was fantastic.
And then the second season that we did with Anne and Neil deGrasse Tyson as the host, I was more directly involved. I was basically a science consultant on that, the first new season that we did, but then was more involved as a writer and producer on the second one.
That was just, again, it’s like a dream come true. It’s so strange, you know, because I loved the original Star Trek. I didn’t really start watching it until it was in reruns when I was in high school. I fell in love, you know. I loved Carl’s writing and I loved Cosmos. And here I am all these years later, right? And I get to do the things that I loved doing when I was a child, basically.
A.C.:What’s the most unusual or unexpected source of inspiration you’ve drawn from while working on The Orville?
A.B.: Yeah, that absolutely happens. You know, sometimes ideas just sort of come to you when we’re in the writers’ room and we’re working on stories and we run into a dead end, you know, it’s like, oh my gosh, we just set this up, now what do we do, you know, how’s that going to get fixed, you know. Sometimes, you know, something will pop into my head.
It’s true with all the other writers as well. Oh, what if we did this? What if we did that? Sometimes in my own writing, you know, when I’m just typing and trying to come up with the next sentence.
Something will pop up in my head. That never occurred to me as I was thinking about it, planning it, it just showed up, you know? And that’s part of the creative process. It’s both, and that’s what’s exciting to me about it too. It’s both invention and discovery.
When I play the piano, I’ve played the piano since I was six years old. When I got older, I learned more about harmony and theory, and I learned how to improvise and, you know, learned about chord progressions. There are times when I sit at the piano, I know what I’m doing. I’ll say, I want to start with a certain progression. I’ll do da-da-da-da. Other times, I just sit down and sort of start messing around and something just jumps that’s just so strange and it’s just preparation. It’s many many years of practice, you know, preparation.
Things just start to start to perk up from that subconscious part of your mind. When something is discovered, a new exoplanet, and, Oh my gosh seven planets orbiting a Red Dwarf star. Who would have thought such a thing was possible? It stirs my imagination, right?
A.C.: If you could bring one piece of technology from The Orville into our real world, what would it be and why?
A.B.: I would say without question the quantum drive. So, we would be able to travel to not only other star systems, but right off the bat, just the other planets in our own solar system. I would love to be able to get in a spaceship and be on the moon in a few minutes, and you know, to go to Mars, and it only takes an hour to get there, or Jupiter, Saturn. See it all of the incredible places in our own solar system, the asteroids and comets.
I would spend the first couple of years, I think, if I had a faster-than-light quantum drop, just exploring our solar system. Then I would go to the nearest star systems and, you know, you could spend thousands of years exploring just the tiniest fraction of the stars and planets in our galaxy that we know about. That would be amazing. So I’d say without question, faster than light travel.
A.C.:Can you share a behind-the-scenes moment that was particularly fun or unexpected?
A.B.: I don’t know if there is any particular one. It’s always fun to be on set and to watch the scenes being shot, to see the actors, to see how they prepare. It takes a long time to film each individual scene, because if it’s a scene that has two, three, four, five characters…
Well, you’ve got to shoot it from different angles, you’ve got to do what we call like a wide shot or an establishing shot, and then you’re typically going to do close-ups of the characters. And a two or three minute scene, you know, will typically take hours to, well, we used to say to film, now it’s all digital, but you know, you understand the idea. And the time in between takes.
Well, as a writer, I don’t have a lot to do. So I’m just kind of standing there watching. But when I get a chance to, you know, talk to the actors, talk to the camera people, the director, that’s always enjoyable. There’s not a lot of hijinks on this set.
It’s fun to watch some of the stunts and the special effects work that are done on set. I love seeing the sets being built. We did an amazing set for this episode that Brannon and I wrote for the second season. I’m sorry, the third season, where Claire Finn, our doctor, meets an old flame who’s become an admiral, somebody that she was actually married to.
We have this strange alien space station that we go in and explore. And you’ve seen that episode, of course, and you know what happens. Watching them build that set was amazing. And to see the final product was really cool. Being on set when we have a lot of aliens and makeup, that’s always fun.
We did another episode in the third season where Teleya becomes the leader of the Krill. And she does a big speech in front of a crowd of thousands. A lot of those thousands were created in the computer, right, digital effects. They’re all in the far distance.
But we probably had a hundred actors in full Krill makeup on set to be part of the parts of this crowd. To walk around on that set and to see all of these aliens, you know, it’s like, oh my God, you feel like you’re on an alien planet. And that’s really fun.
One of the great things that Seth did when he created the show is, you know, special effects are almost entirely now done in the computer. So I remember when I was working on Star Trek: Voyager, we had a beautiful six-foot-long fiberglass model of the Starship Voyager. That’s the model you see in the opening credits sequence when the ship is flying through space and it’s the model you see when, you know, the ship takes up orbit around some planet and what we call the hero shots, right?
Well, by I think about the fifth season of Star Trek: Voyager, that model got put in a box and was never photographed again. They scanned it. They did 3D scanning. They have this little pen connected to a computer. They run it over the hull to get all the shapes. And then they recreated it in a digital effects software package. And that’s what we used from then on. We would still use old shots of the big beautiful model, but it was never filmed again.
When we did Star Trek: Enterprise, we never even built a model. It was just all done on the computer. It doesn’t look quite the same. And when Seth came to The Orville, he said, “I want to build a model. I want to use a model for the hero shots.” Stephen Line, and we did the design, which is amazing. And I got to see them build and shoot that model.
That was a lot of fun. Wow, this is not done anymore. I got to see the model of the Deep Space Nine space station. I got to see the Voyager. But that was years ago. And to see a beautiful model and the lighting, the internal lighting and everything else, all the details, just gorgeous.
And then to watch how they shot that on set, you know, when we were starting. You know, the way they mounted it on a, you know, on this metal rig. And then they had the cameras on, you know, on cranes and things that could zoom around and just the movements and stuff. It was magical. It was really great. I got to say.
A.C.:Do you have a favorite ship from The Orville?
A.B: I love the Orville itself. My next favorite might be the one that we created for season three, the Pterodon, the little fighter ship that Gordon flies. And also John was flying them as well. That’s really cool. And again, I got to see that designed and built. And we had a full-scale model of it on set, which was really cool. And I think it’s a beautiful design.
It was fun to write. Brannon and I wrote the episode ‘Domino‘ which featured a very long VFX battle sequence involving the Pterodon, some Krill ships, and some Moclan ships. That was exciting to watch and to see how that came together. I think that ended up being our longest episode. I think that clocked in at like 87 and 15-20 minutes of that were the battle scenes. So that was like wow, that was pretty great.
A.C:Looking back at your career, what project or accomplishment are you most proud of, and why?
A.B: Certainly The Orville. I feel like it’s kind of the pinnacle of my career. But also, Cosmos, you know, Cosmos is right up there. It’s very special to me because Carl Sagan and Annie Druyan, his wife, were so formative to my career and my thinking, and the books that they wrote together. As well as Carl’s work, you know, his solo work, so great.
The original Cosmos TV series that they did in the early 1980s was fantastic. It was groundbreaking in a lot of ways. And again, I never would have imagined when I first saw the original Cosmos, when I met Anne and Carl at a book signing in Washington DC in the early 1990s for a book that they had written called Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors. They did a thing at the Smithsonian while I was living in Washington DC and got to meet them and have them sign the book. I never would have imagined that there would be another Cosmos TV series, that I would be involved in it.
It was so great. Like I said, it’s pinched me. It seems unreal sometimes. These are things that I loved and were the things that really shaped me as a person growing up, my interest in science. Carl was such a great writer of science prose. It was inspirational.
Those books that he wrote. And just when I would read a textbook, physics textbooks, they’re so dry. It’s like why can’t they be even a little like Carl Sagan? Where’s the sense of wonder, you know, where’s the excitement and again, well, you know you’re there to learn the equations and to learn how to solve them and that, Physics is applied math, and that at some level, it is what it is.
And yet I found especially through cosmos, as a physics major in college, they taught me very little, and I’m sure this is true in most schools, very little about the history of science.
I mean you learn the names Newton and Faraday and Maxwell. You know a little bit about them as people because Newton created, the universal law of gravitation and Maxwell created Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism and of course everybody knows Einstein and special and general relativity but to really get deep into the lives of these men and women as we did on cosmos gives you a whole nother level of appreciation and I find that it makes me just that much more interested in the science that they created and I bet a lot of people would find science and math more interesting if it was taught by first introducing you to the people who did this work and how they did it.
Michael Faraday, who was a pioneer in electromagnetism in the 1850s and 60s, he was, born in poverty, basically. He was the son of a bookbinder. He loved science. He was fascinated by it and he lived in London and he would go to meetings of the Royal Society.
He set up in the nosebleed seats and listen to Humphry Davy and all these other people do these lectures and he would take all of these notes because he was so fascinated by it. Then he showed some of his notes to Humphry Davy who was the president of society and a brilliant chemist and vetted a lot of important stuff. And he took him on as his assistant.
If that had never happened, the history of science would be very different. And those stories are amazing and inspiring. And I think that’s what’s missing from a lot of education these days, is that inspirational component. And that’s what I hope we do with a show like The Orville and what we do with Cosmos.
A.C.:Aside from your work, what are some of your favorite science fiction books, movies, or TV shows that have influenced you?
A.B.: There’s so many. I was a huge fan of Breaking Bad. That’s a show that popped into my head here, just as you asked me the question. I happen to know the guy who created that, Vince Gilligan. He worked with a close friend of mine, Frank Spotnitz, on a show called The X-Files, which you probably know. And I met Vince a few times through Frank. More recent stuff, again, there is so much out there. My wife and I watched Drops of God, this show about a woman whose father was a wine enthusiast and a kind of an obsessive wine enthusiast.
I thought that was great. I really loved it. You know, it’s not science fiction by any means, but it was fantastic. And oh gosh, you know, there was a movie that came out here a couple of months ago called Hitman that we really liked.
I like a wide variety of things. I’m not just into science fiction, but of course science fiction is what I first fell in love with when I was young. But I love all forms of literature and music that are done well.
One of my favorite movies of all time is An American in Paris. Gene Kelly, Leslie Caron, and Oscar Levant. Because I’m a huge fan of George Gershwin. And I love Gershwin on the piano. His story is an amazing story and that movie is just beautiful, a wonderful movie. And it’s all about music, and art, and living life and heartbreak. It’s just great stuff.
I’m a big fan of Jimmy Webb. We’ve used a couple of his songs that Gordon’s done. And I met him when he did a concert in Santa Barbara last year that I went to, and I met him backstage afterward. He met Seth and Scott Grimes at a party in New York a couple of months before this concert and he said he was so thrilled that they love his music and that they used a couple of his songs in our show. You know, wow, what an amazing network of interesting, fun people and creative people. It’s truly a privilege to work, you know, to be able to do this work.
A.C.:How do you see the genre of science fiction evolving in the next decade, both in TV and literature?
A.B.: I think it’s, a show like The Orville is needed now more than ever, because we do live in a kind of a dystopian world. My parents grew up in Europe during the Depression and the Second World War, as probably your parents or grandparents did, right? And that was a terrible time, and they didn’t really start sharing some of their stories until they were older.
The world is definitely a better place now in many respects than it was then, but it’s still got a lot of problems that frankly, they don’t need to be. These are not unsolvable problems. It’s just because there are people who are greedy and selfish and too in love with their own power, to sort of get out of the way and let the rest of the world who I think are, you know, most people are good, well-meaning, and generally kind-hearted. It’s the few bad people, who have the power to make the world a difficult place.
I understand that there is a lot of injustice still in the world, and that needs to be addressed. But violence is not the way to do that. I think that science fiction definitely went in a much more dystopian direction in the 80s, 90s, 2000s, you know. One of the reasons that Seth created The Orville, maybe the main reason is because he wanted to see the kind of hopeful, optimistic, forward-looking science fiction that Star Trek represented in the 60s and 70s and 80s that has been missing for so many years.
And I think we’re going to need more of that, not less of it. You know? I love the movies Alien and Blade Runner, that’s great stuff. But you need to have light as well as darkness, right? And I think that I hope that there is more optimistic, hopeful science fiction in the coming years, because I think we’re going to need it. You know, with AI, whatever that, you know, whatever doors that opens, that could be very challenging in the next few years. Or it could be very great. You know, it could be wonderful.
It’s doing, it’s already doing great work in medicine and material science and other things. You know, as long as it’s, as long as it’s in the hands of the, of people who have good intentions, and even then, you know, there are always potential problems you don’t see that could become really bad. But I like to remain optimistic.
A.C.: I also think art is safe from AI taking over because the most important thing about art is that it comes from another human being. Like singing—it’s Seth singing or you playing the piano. And that’s why we get goosebumps. It’s incredible because it comes from another human being.
A.B.: Yes. Right. I don’t think that it will ever replace humans in that respect. Certainly not in the arts, not in creative writing. It can mimic, it can generate interesting things. It may become that’s just interesting as a thing in itself. I can imagine people, you know, like… I have a nephew who’s 25 years old. He’s working on a PhD in mathematics. Very bright kid. You know, he grew up in a very different world than I did. He didn’t watch typical TV shows the way that I did growing up, that you turn in every Thursday night at eight-thirty to watch Friends or whatever.
Very different world that he grew up in and a lot of what he did with his friends in high school and college was, they would play video games together and comment on video games that other people were playing that’s like wow that’s that’s how they spent a lot of their free time. And then they would create their own videos, and they’d share them on Instagram.
Well, I think, you know, there will be interesting AI-generated videos that people will create with whatever prompts they put into the programs, that will be interesting, and that will be shared on Instagram and other platforms and get a lot of views. But they will be their own things.
I think they will be recognized as, oh, this is AI output. And I don’t think that that will substitute for people, actors, directors, screenwriters. I just don’t. I don’t really see that happening. I think there’s a lot of hype around AI. I’ve played around with chat GPT-4 and some of it I thought very good, very interesting. Others, it’s like, really? And it takes a lot of energy, you know, it uses a lot of electricity and power. It’s gotten to the point where the servers that are doing this stuff, it’s almost as much energy as the airline industries are using now, you know. I mean, it’s crazy.
And there’s a limit to how much energy will be available for those kinds of things, too. It seems like it takes exponential increases of effort on the part of the people who create these programs to just make small incremental improvements in how the software operates. I don’t think this is going to be a revolution in the next few years. Maybe I’m wrong.
I hope it continues to do things like you know look at 200,000 different protein molecules and five ones that are most likely to work as great new drugs for treating disease, we don’t know how to treat yet. That’s the kind of thing that I think it can probably do well. I hope that becomes the main application.
People are playing around with it to make a little 30-second movie. Well, that might be interesting, might be engaging for 30 seconds. Don’t think that we’re anywhere close to something like that becoming feature film length and people are going to be swarming the movies to go see something that was completely generated by AI in a theater for two hours. Maybe never. It just may never really take off in that way. It may turn out to be that’s not a useful thing for it to do.
A.C.:What do you hope will be the lasting legacy of The Orville in the realm of science fiction television?
A.B.: I hope it continues to inspire. Based on the interactions I’ve had with fans. It provides a level of sort of optimism and hope. I think younger fans watch it and they see that the future can be incredible if we choose to build that future and they will therefore be inspired to grow up to do such things, make such things possible. And I’m already seeing that in the interactions that I have with younger fans of like Comic-Con and I hope to be able to go to more.
I’m doing a Star Trek convention next month in Las Vegas. So I’ll be out there. I’m sure there will be lots of questions about The Orville.
I think, as a legacy, to be able to say that you inspired a generation of young people to think more positively about the future. To get engaged with social issues. To get involved in sciences not necessarily just as scientists or doctors or engineers, which is great of course, but as citizens who understand the importance of these technologies and the importance of using them well, using them to promote human welfare, not to hurt people, right? That’s part of the legacy of the show as well, I think.
Jessica Olson (aka JO) was born and raised in San Diego, where her love for climbing took off. She was introduced to the sport by some friends who took her out to climb at Mt. Lemmon while attending University of Arizona. It wasn’t until she came back to the states after traveling abroad for 8 months, that she truly started to shape her life around climbing. Moving back to San Diego, JO started working at the local climbing gym in 2014 and over the course of 3 years learned the ins and outs of the climbing lifestyle.
Having found a passion for teaching youth, JO wanted to take the classroom outside, to where her dreams continued to grow. After acquiring her SPI in 2016, she started to seek outlets that would allow her to develop as a guide. She built out her small SUV and hit the road, making her way to Alaska for a summer of guiding. While living on the road, Jo has traveled across the country in the pursuit of adventure, finding joy in the Eastern Sierra, Washington Pass, Squamish, Deserts of Utah, and out east in Tennessee and Kentucky. Since moving away from San Diego, she has been guiding primarily in the Pacific Northwest, furthering her love for teaching others how to become self sufficient climbers.
JO is an AMGA Apprentice Alpine and Rock Guide, Single Pitch Instructor, and Wilderness Emergency Medical Technician.
1. Why did you want to become a guide?
I started instructing at a Climbing Gym, and was welcomed into an amazing community of like minded climbers, who always wanted to go climbing outside. No matter what skill level each person was at, everyone was stoked to get out and have fun. Each person I went out climbing with, would teach me new skills, help grow my tools both on my harness and in my mind, getting me hooked on the learning process and growing my desire to continue my educational development in the climbing world. It got to a point where I wanted to learn the technical meanings of ‘why’ for every part of climbing. Building my own foundation of understanding and becoming more self-sufficient in the sport became so important to me, enabling me to become a leader and better explain the ‘why’ to friends when they started to ask me questions. A good friend and mentor was planning on signing up for their SPI course and exam, and I quickly followed suit, what better way to really solidify those skills, than to become a certified instructor? From there, my passion for teaching others about the sport evolved and developed into where I am today.
2. What’s your favorite part of the job?
My favorite part of guiding are the events I run called Ladies Weekend Out. Each event is focused around empowering women to learn foundational skills for whatever adventures they find themselves pursuing from Rock Climbing, to Backpacking and Backcountry Snow Travel. I love seeing the fire ignite with each person I work with, as they learn and acquire the tools in working towards becoming self-sufficient in the specific disciplines we dive into.
3. What’s your least favorite part of the job?
As I’ve grown within my role, I find myself on the computer a lot more than I’m actually in the field, be that for guiding or personal adventures. While I love being able to coordinate events, plan trips and make all the magic happen, it’s quite a role change from when I first was getting into climbing or developing as a guide.
4. What are some hard truths about guiding?
It’s hard on your body, mind and soul. Long days, little compensation (especially when you start, although it’s getting better), being looked down on for being small or being a woman, guiding is hard work and you’re not always appreciated for everything you do. With that being said, it’s also so rewarding in seeing your personal strengths develop, how much you’re able to problem solve at the drop of a dime and how nurshing the work can be when you guide people with purpose, and who are so grateful for sharing your experiences and knowledge to help them in their own personal growth.
5. How do you see guiding evolving in the future?
I would love to see guiding evolve to be more encompassed within educational establishments, partnering with climbing gyms and brands who are at the forefront in seeing the climbing culture boom. It would be awesome to create broader partnership with companies to make a positive impact by providing the tools (be that the gear we use to climb, or the accessibility to understanding movement and systems within a educational space) by partnering with guides and guide services to help break down the barrier for education, and helping foster a community of responsible people recreating in outdoor spaces.
A hook and ladder company, gravediggers and bingo enthusiasts are some of the eye-popping denizens truly celebrated by film director and photographer Neal Slavin in the expanded golden anniversary edition of When Two or More are Gathered Together. Years ago, his group portrait of a boy-scout troop, all shiny medals, reds and tans, faces freckled or milky white, inspired a life-long allegiance to color and a fascination with groups. “I want my work to affirm our self-identity within our public persona; to affirm the joy of being together rather than being apart.” My, how tribes have changed.
Managing payroll in Idaho can feel like navigating a maze. You need to ensure every paycheck is accurate while staying compliant with state and federal laws. This guide will help you understand the key aspects of payroll management in Idaho.
Payroll mistakes can lead to fines and unhappy employees. By following the right steps, you can avoid these pitfalls and keep your business running smoothly.
Let’s dive into the specifics of payroll management and compliance in Idaho.
Idaho Payroll Laws and Regulations
Understanding Idaho payroll laws is key to managing your business effectively. Here’s what you need to know:
Idaho Payroll Laws Employers Must Follow
Employers in Idaho must adhere to both state and federal payroll regulations. This includes correctly classifying employees, adhering to wage laws, and ensuring timely payment of wages. Employers must also comply with laws regarding employee benefits and protections. For more detailed guidance, check out this payroll guide for new employers.
Minimum Wage and Overtime Requirements
Idaho’s minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, aligning with the federal rate. For tipped employees, the minimum wage is $3.35 per hour, provided their tips bring their total earnings to at least the standard minimum wage. If not, employers must make up the difference. Overtime pay is required at 1.5 times the regular hourly rate for any hours worked over 40 in a workweek.
Pay Frequency and Final Paycheck Rules
Idaho law mandates that employees must be paid at least once per month. Employers can choose to pay more frequently, such as bi-weekly or weekly. When an employee leaves the company, either voluntarily or involuntarily, their final paycheck must be issued by the next scheduled payday or within ten days, whichever comes first. You can simply automate payroll to ensure timely payments and compliance.
Payroll Tax Obligations
Employers must withhold federal income tax, Social Security, and Medicare taxes from employees’ wages. Idaho state income tax must also be withheld. Employers are responsible for paying unemployment insurance tax and contributing to the state’s workers’ compensation fund. Accurate and timely tax payments are necessary to avoid penalties.
Record keeping and Reporting Requirements
Employers must maintain detailed payroll records for each employee. This includes personal information, hours worked, wages paid, and tax withholdings. Records must be kept for at least three years. Employers must also report new hires to the Idaho Department of Labor within 20 days. Quarterly wage reports and annual tax filings are required to stay compliant with state and federal regulations. You should make detailed payroll records to maintain compliance and streamline audits.
Setting Up Payroll in Idaho
Setting up payroll might seem overwhelming, but it’s crucial for compliance and smooth operations. Here’s where to start:
Obtaining a Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN)
Start by obtaining a Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) from the IRS. This number identifies your business for tax purposes. You can apply online through the IRS website, and you’ll receive your FEIN immediately. This number is necessary for all your payroll and tax filings.
Registering with the Idaho State Tax Commission
Next, register your business with the Idaho State Tax Commission. This step ensures you can withhold state income taxes from your employees’ wages. Visit the Idaho State Tax Commission website and complete the registration process. You’ll receive a withholding account number, which you’ll use for all state tax filings.
Setting up Workers’ Compensation Insurance
Idaho law requires employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance. This insurance covers medical expenses and lost wages for employees who get injured on the job. Contact a licensed insurance provider in Idaho to set up your policy. Make sure to provide accurate information about your business and employees to get the right coverage.
Collecting Employee Information and Tax Forms
Gather all necessary information and tax forms from your employees. This includes Form W-4 for federal tax withholding and Form I-9 for employment eligibility verification. Ensure each employee completes these forms accurately. Keep these documents on file as part of your payroll records.
Choosing a Payroll System or Service
Decide whether you’ll handle payroll in-house or use a payroll service. A payroll system can automate many tasks, such as calculating wages, withholding taxes, and filing tax forms. Look for a system that integrates with your existing tools and meets your business needs. If you choose a payroll service, ensure it offers features like direct deposit, tax filing, and compliance with Idaho laws. This choice can save you time and reduce the risk of errors.
Running Payroll in Idaho
Running payroll accurately is crucial to keep your employees happy and your business compliant.
Calculating Gross Pay
Start by determining each employee’s gross pay. For hourly workers, multiply the number of hours worked by their hourly wage. Include any overtime pay, calculated at 1.5 times the regular hourly rate for hours worked over 40 in a week. For salaried employees, divide the annual salary by the number of pay periods in the year. Add any bonuses, commissions, or other earnings to the gross pay.
Withholding Taxes (Federal, State, Local)
Next, calculate the necessary tax withholdings. Federal tax withholdings include federal income tax, Social Security, and Medicare. Use the employee’s W-4 form to determine the correct amount of federal income tax to withhold. Social Security tax is 6.2% of the employee’s gross pay, up to the annual limit. Medicare tax is 1.45% of all gross pay, with an additional 0.9% for earnings over a certain threshold.
For state tax withholdings, use the Idaho State Tax Commission guidelines to determine the correct amount of state income tax to withhold. Idaho does not have local income taxes, so you won’t need to worry about local tax withholdings.
Deducting Benefits and Other Withholdings
Deduct any employee benefits and other withholdings from the gross pay. This includes health insurance premiums, retirement plan contributions, and any other voluntary deductions. Make sure to also deduct any mandatory withholdings, such as wage garnishments for child support payments. Calculate these deductions accurately to ensure compliance and avoid any issues.
Issuing Paychecks or Direct Deposits
Once you have calculated the net pay (gross pay minus all withholdings and deductions), you can issue paychecks or set up direct deposits. Ensure that each employee receives their pay on the scheduled payday. For direct deposits, provide the necessary information to your bank or payroll service provider. If issuing paper checks, make sure they are signed and distributed on time.
Maintaining Payroll Records
Keep detailed records of all payroll transactions. This includes records of hours worked, gross pay, tax withholdings, deductions, and net pay. Store these records securely and ensure they are easily accessible for audits or employee inquiries. Maintain records for at least three years, as required by federal and state laws. Accurate recordkeeping helps you stay compliant and resolve any payroll disputes quickly.
Save time on payroll.
Auto-convert timesheets into wages, catch errors, pay your team, and file taxes all in one place.
Idaho Payroll Taxes
Understanding payroll taxes in Idaho is key to managing your business’s financial responsibilities. Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know.
Types of Payroll Taxes in Idaho
In Idaho, payroll taxes include federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare taxes, state income tax, and unemployment insurance tax. Additionally, you need to account for workers’ compensation insurance. Each of these taxes has specific requirements and rates that you must follow to stay compliant.
Employer Responsibilities for Payroll Taxes
As an employer, you are responsible for withholding the correct amount of taxes from your employees’ wages and remitting these amounts to the appropriate agencies. This includes federal income tax, Social Security, Medicare, and Idaho state income tax. You also need to pay your share of Social Security and Medicare taxes, as well as federal and state unemployment taxes. Keeping accurate records and making timely payments are crucial to avoid penalties. For more tips, visit how to do payroll for small business.
Idaho Income Tax Withholding Rates
Idaho requires you to withhold state income tax from your employees’ wages. The withholding rates vary based on the employee’s income and filing status. You can find the specific withholding tables on the Idaho State Tax Commission website. Ensure you update your payroll system with the latest rates to calculate the correct withholding amounts.
Unemployment Insurance Tax
Idaho employers must pay unemployment insurance tax to the Idaho Department of Labor. This tax funds unemployment benefits for workers who lose their jobs through no fault of their own. The tax rate varies depending on your business’s experience rating, which is influenced by the number of former employees who have claimed unemployment benefits. New employers typically start with a standard rate, which can change based on their experience over time.
Workers’ Compensation Insurance
Idaho law requires employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance. This insurance covers medical expenses and lost wages for employees who suffer work-related injuries or illnesses. The cost of workers’ compensation insurance depends on your industry and the level of risk associated with the work your employees perform. You can obtain this insurance through private insurers or the state fund. Make sure your coverage is adequate and up-to-date to protect both your employees and your business.
Idaho Payroll Forms and Filings
Handling payroll in Idaho involves several key forms and filings to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Here’s what you need to know:
W-4 and I-9 Forms for New Hires
When you hire a new employee, they must complete a W-4 form. This form determines the amount of federal income tax to withhold from their paychecks. Ensure the employee fills it out accurately and keeps it on file. Additionally, the I-9 form is required to verify the employee’s eligibility to work in the United States. You must review the provided documents and complete the employer section of the I-9 within three days of the employee’s start date.
Quarterly Wage Reports
Each quarter, you need to file wage reports with the Idaho Department of Labor. These reports detail the wages paid to each employee and the unemployment insurance taxes owed. Timely submission of these reports helps you stay compliant and avoid penalties. Use the Idaho Department of Labor’s online system to file these reports efficiently.
Annual W-2 and 1099 Filings
At the end of each year, you must provide W-2 forms to your employees. The W-2 form summarizes the employee’s earnings and the taxes withheld throughout the year. You must also file copies with the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Idaho State Tax Commission. For independent contractors, issue 1099 forms to report their earnings. Ensure all forms are distributed and filed by January 31st to meet federal and state deadlines.
New Hire Reporting
Idaho law requires you to report new hires to the Idaho Department of Labor within 20 days of their start date. This helps the state enforce child support orders and detect unemployment insurance fraud. You can report new hires online, by mail, or by fax. Include the employee’s name, address, Social Security number, and the date they started working. Accurate and timely reporting keeps you compliant and supports state programs.
Payroll Recordkeeping in Idaho
Accurate payroll recordkeeping in Idaho is mandatory for compliance and smooth business operations. Here’s what you need to know:
Required Payroll Records to Maintain
You must keep detailed records for each employee. This includes personal information, hours worked, wages paid, tax withholdings, and any deductions. Also, maintain records of employment agreements, time-off requests, and benefits provided. These records help you track payments and resolve any discrepancies.
Timeframe for Keeping Payroll Records
Idaho law requires you to keep payroll records for at least three years. This includes all documentation related to employee wages, hours worked, and tax withholdings. Keeping these records for the required time frame ensures you are prepared for audits or any legal inquiries that may arise.
Storage and Accessibility of Records
Store payroll records in a secure and organized manner. Digital records should be backed up regularly and protected with strong passwords. Physical records should be kept in a locked, fireproof cabinet. Ensure that records are easily accessible for review by authorized personnel, but protected from unauthorized access.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failing to maintain accurate payroll records can lead to penalties and legal issues. You may face fines from state and federal agencies, and your business reputation could suffer. Inaccurate records can also result in disputes with employees and complications during audits. Ensuring compliance with recordkeeping requirements helps you avoid these problems and keeps your business running smoothly.
Common Idaho Payroll Mistakes to Avoid
Misclassifying employees as independent contractors can lead to significant penalties. Ensure you correctly classify workers based on their job duties and relationship with your business. Employees typically have set hours and specific duties, while independent contractors have more control over their work and schedule.
Not withholding the correct taxes is another common mistake. You must withhold federal income tax, Social Security, Medicare, and Idaho state income tax from your employees’ wages. Use the correct tax tables and ensure you update your payroll system with the latest rates to avoid under or over-withholding.
Missing payroll tax payment or filing deadlines can result in fines and interest charges. Federal and state agencies have strict deadlines for tax deposits and filings. Mark these dates on your calendar and set reminders to ensure timely payments and submissions.
Failing to maintain accurate records can cause issues during audits and employee disputes. Keep detailed records of hours worked, wages paid, tax withholdings, and any deductions. Ensure records are stored securely and are easily accessible for review.
Not providing required employee notices can lead to compliance issues. Idaho law requires you to inform employees about their pay rate, payday, and any deductions. Ensure you provide these notices in writing and keep a copy for your records.
How Homebase Can Simplify Idaho Payroll
Accurate timekeeping and payroll calculations are vital for smooth payroll management. With advanced tools, you can track employee hours precisely. This ensures that each paycheck reflects the actual time worked, reducing errors and disputes. Automated systems calculate wages, overtime, and deductions accurately, saving you time and effort.
Automated tax filings and payments streamline the payroll process. You no longer need to worry about missing deadlines or making mistakes on tax forms. The system handles federal, state, and local tax filings, ensuring compliance with Idaho’s tax regulations. Automated payments mean taxes are paid on time, avoiding penalties and interest charges.
Secure online access to payroll records keeps your data safe and accessible. You can store all payroll information in a secure, cloud-based system. This allows you to access records anytime, anywhere, without worrying about data loss. Employees can also view their pay stubs and tax forms online, reducing administrative tasks.
Expert Idaho payroll support provides you with the assistance you need. Whether you have questions about state-specific regulations or need help with a payroll issue, expert support is available. This ensures you stay compliant with Idaho laws and handle any payroll challenges effectively.
Affordable pricing for small businesses makes advanced payroll solutions accessible. You don’t need a large budget to benefit from accurate timekeeping, automated tax filings, and expert support. Affordable plans allow you to manage payroll efficiently without breaking the bank.
Managing payroll in Idaho can be complex, but with the right tools and knowledge, you can handle it efficiently. Homebase offers comprehensive solutions to streamline your payroll processes, ensuring compliance and accuracy.
TL;DR
– What: Managing payroll in Idaho is tricky and law-heavy.
– So What: Mistakes can lead to fines and upset employees.